i stopped at skateboarding hipster.
but how could anyone hate spidey 2?
i stopped at skateboarding hipster.
but how could anyone hate spidey 2?
It's depressing, dreary, filled with lots of poor characterization and extremely boring. Not what I want to see in a Spider-Man movie personally. The only notable thing in the movie is the awesome train fight. The first movie while not perfect worked WAAAAY better as a Spider-Man movie. Looks like it will be a while until it's topped too.Originally Posted by Earth-2 Superman
What about Molina's Dock Ock?
even though I did hate that they never called him Doctor Octopus and the last minute good guy turn (which was bs, just like Sandman's in 3)
See: 'poor characterization'
You can tell who actually grew up reading Spider-Man comics and who just claims to have grown up reading Spider-Man comics when people say shit like "it's the perfect Spider-Man movie".
well I would never say I grew up reading spider-man comics or that its the perfect spider-man movie. The closest Ive ever seen to a perfect comic book movie is the incredibles, and that's probably not gonna change in my lifetime.
Watched it today. I agree with a lot of what Doom said. The first hour is essentially the same as the first one. Actually, to be honest, the whole film kinda feels like the first two Spidermans thrown together in a blender (as both got a scientist bad guy that Parker befriends and they are both larger power house villains) with some hipster angst added because why not. I like Garfield as Spiderman but as Parker the kid almost seems autistic and retarded at times. Very inconsistent with him being so confident and mocking behind the mask and the next day being so awkward and weird, or perhaps that is what they were goin for. The action is decently good, my favorite is early Spiderman goin all Parkour on the bar bad guys. The tower fall was also great but we all already seen that on the trailers. In all, there is nothing too wrong about it, but there isn't anything too right about it either, and it was completely unnecessary. And the 3D was pointless and poorly done.
i liked it, and IMO Ben's death was more emotional this time, Sheen fucking killed as Ben...no pun intended. Garfield was as Peter/Spider-Man i had no problems. Overall a good 8/10, ATLEAST 7.5/10, there was problems yes there always is. At times it felt like two different movies blending together. What i DIDNT like at all was half the movie was in regular 2D and what they did with Conners was just so generic they had something in the beginning but as soon as he turned into the Lizard he just became a generic villain, shame.
I wouldn't call it the perfect Spider-Man movie but I do think it's the best of the trilogy as well as one of the best superhero movies period, poor characterization or not. lol @ calling it dreary though, remember this shit:
This shit is pure uplifting cinematic gold, b.
That's not even 2 minutes out of how many? this is the movie where Spider-Man is so depressed that he loses his superpowers. He gets so lonely that the most significantly framed moment in his life becomes the scene where some weirdo chick brings him cake.
lol, I forgot all about that cake shit. Man, that movie was good.
Anyway, yes, it dealt with Peter being 'broken' as Spider-Man and all that but that's a typical character arc in superhero fiction and it was done very well. The thing where they fucked up was that they didn't build on that in the third movie and had him come back even stronger and more confident than before. Well, the movie did actually start out like that, but then they did all that other shit that shouldn't have been there like Venom, the flag-waving and that annoying British female reporter who later died of brain cancer or something (the actress, not the character).
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
